On the Y-axis, the number of points is shown, while the X-axis shows the respective rank. Hawaii scores 607 points for Best and Worst State Economies for Women Index, or rank 8 among all 51 countries, which is considered "fair" (Alaska: 568 points = "fair"). The score of the index is the weighted average of the component indicators.

B   3 panes view for comparing countries - dashboard Index Earnings and Employment

A typical Dashboard view, showing several pie charts with a series of indicators. Colours represent relative performance for each indicator. The index (central circle) is calculated as the weighted average of the indicator points.

C   Two panes view - distribution of "Index Earnings and Employment"

On the Y-axis, the number of points is shown, while the X-axis shows the respective rank. Ohio scores 427 points for Index Earnings and Employment, or rank 29 among all 51 countries, which is considered "bad".

D   Analysis view - distribution of "Index Earnings and Employment"

On the Y-axis, the number of points is shown, while the X-axis shows the respective rank. Iowa scores 446 points for Index Earnings and Employment, or rank 27 among all 51 countries, which is considered "average". The score of the index is the weighted average of the component indicators.

E   Analysis view - scatterplot Index Economic Policy Environment vs Index Earnings and Employment

A simple scatterplot may reveal interesting insights - for example, how is Index Economic Policy Environment linked to "Index Earnings and Employment"? Michigan scores "average" for Index Economic Policy Environment (Y axis, 549 points for 549 Points) and "bad" for Index Earnings and Employment (X axis, 386 points). In contrast, Alaska gets a "average" for Index Economic Policy Environment (Y=531 points for 531 Points) and "fair" for Index Earnings and Employment (X=386 points).

F   Analysis view - map of United States: Index Earnings and Employment

The map of United States in embedded mode, using the Dashboard's colour code - on top District of Columbia for Index Earnings and Employment, at the bottom Louisiana. Illinois scores 461 points, or rank 23 among all 51 countries, which is considered "average" (Texas: 437 points, "bad"). The score of the index is the weighted average of the component indicators.

G   Analysis view - map of United States: Index Economic Policy Environment

On top Minnesota for Index Economic Policy Environment, at the bottom Louisiana. Missouri scores 522 points, or rank 25 among all 51 countries, which is considered "average" (Nebraska: 583 points, "fair"). The score of the index is the weighted average of the component indicators.

H   Analysis view - map of United States: Best and Worst State Economies for Women Index

On top District of Columbia for Best and Worst State Economies for Women Index, at the bottom Louisiana. Ohio scores 483 points, or rank 23 among all 51 countries, which is considered "average" (Nebraska: 529 points, "average"). The score of the index is the weighted average of the component indicators.

I   Analysis view - index tree Minnesota

Displays the structure of the overall index (with colour codes for Minnesota)

The Dashboard shows how Institute for Women’s Policy Research, IWPR indicators could be used to assess the overall performance of countries. This dashboard is structured as follows:

The Best and Worst State Economies for Women Index is composed of 2 sub-indices: (in brackets: No. of indicators) - Index Earnings and Employment (4) - Index Economic Policy Environment (5) The database contains 9 indicators for 50 countries.